Knox County audit-report confidentiality review

Highest-priority passages

1. 1. Insufficient source coverage — high concern

   Source: Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05

   Locator: Analyzed ~490 characters

   highCoverage

   The extracted target text is short, so omissions may be overstated and citation quality will be limited.

   Why this is concerning:

   • Human verification needs a fuller source document or OCR for image-only PDFs.

   Recommended action: Provide a fuller document and re-run the scan against your compliance layer.

2. 2. Unmonitored / camera-coverage detail in Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05 — high concern

   Source: Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05

   Locator: approx. character offset 197 — search target for “camera”

   highStatutory risk

   The target discusses camera, unmonitored, monitoring in a way that may disclose exploitable security or access detail.

   Evidence from target: nts that lack continuous monitoring and camera visibility. Official personnel files are kept in this area. An unmonitored side door near the records room can be used after hours without camera coverag

   Why this is concerning:

   • Publishing where cameras are absent or ineffective can identify an operational vulnerability.
   • It may fit Section 10-7-504(i)(1) (and related subsections in the compliance layer): information identifying an operational vulnerability or usable to gain unauthorized access.
   • A human should verify the exact page/lines before redacting or leaving the passage public.

   Citations to verify:

   • Section 10-7-504(i)(1)

   Recommended action: Replace the public copy with a version that removes the location, camera-coverage, access-method, or storage-arrangement details as applicable. Prefer narrow redaction over withholding the entire otherwise-public document when the layer so provides.

3. 3. Physical access / entry-point detail in Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05 — high concern

   Source: Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05

   Locator: approx. character offset 148 — search target for “entry”

   highStatutory risk

   The target discusses entry, access-control, side door, records room in a way that may disclose exploitable security or access detail.

   Evidence from target: control arrangement identifies specific entry points that lack continuous monitoring and camera visibility. Official personnel files are kept in this area. An unmonitored side door near the records ro

   Why this is concerning:

   • Identifying specific entry points or access arrangements may help unauthorized access.
   • It may fit Section 10-7-504(i)(1) (and related subsections in the compliance layer): information identifying an operational vulnerability or usable to gain unauthorized access.
   • A human should verify the exact page/lines before redacting or leaving the passage public.

   Citations to verify:

   • Section 10-7-504(i)(1)

   Recommended action: Replace the public copy with a version that removes the location, camera-coverage, access-method, or storage-arrangement details as applicable. Prefer narrow redaction over withholding the entire otherwise-public document when the layer so provides.

4. 4. Sensitive records / evidence storage detail in Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05 — high concern

   Source: Final Audit Report FY26-PA-05

   Locator: approx. character offset 225 — search target for “personnel files”

   highStatutory risk

   The target discusses personnel files, narcotics, evidence in a way that may disclose exploitable security or access detail.

   Evidence from target: itoring and camera visibility. Official personnel files are kept in this area. An unmonitored side door near the records room can be used after hours without camera coverage. Page 14 notes cameras th

   Why this is concerning:

   • Locating confidential records or evidence relative to a weakness raises confidentiality risk.
   • It may fit Section 10-7-504(i)(1) (and related subsections in the compliance layer): information identifying an operational vulnerability or usable to gain unauthorized access.
   • A human should verify the exact page/lines before redacting or leaving the passage public.

   Citations to verify:

   • Section 10-7-504(i)(1)

   Recommended action: Replace the public copy with a version that removes the location, camera-coverage, access-method, or storage-arrangement details as applicable. Prefer narrow redaction over withholding the entire otherwise-public document when the layer so provides.